Turf Magazine - October, 2008
Publisher's Notes: Financial Collapse
Are you angry yet? You ought to be. As I write this,
our government is trying to figure out how to “loan” $700 to
$900 billion of our money to a bunch of Wall Street wonks. They screwed up
big-time, walked away with personal fortunes while destroying the savings
of others, and now we are going to reward them with billions of taxpayer
dollars to play with. All the while, trying to get financing for your business
has just become a lot harder. As I’ve been preaching for over a year,
the fundamentals of our economy are fine. If our government had been doing
its job, none of this would have happened.
If you’re one of those people whose eyes gloss
over when talking about this stuff, don’t be. The reasons why this
happened are not complex at all.
Reason #1: Greed, both on the part of the banks and
mortgage companies, and on the part of the individuals who took out the
loans. There’s not one person on Wall Street who doesn’t
understand that you can’t loan money to people who can’t pay it
back. So, why did they do it? Greed.
It’s not hard to figure out that if you can only
afford $750 a month for a mortgage payment, buying a bigger house than you
can afford with a payment that will balloon in five years to $1,000 a month
will lead to a default on the mortgage. So why did these people take on
this debt and buy houses they couldn’t afford? Greed.
Reason #2: The government stuck its nose too far into
the investment business. The Clinton administration loosened the reins on
the mortgage industry. At the same time, democrats pressured the industry
to provide loans to people with lower incomes. That may sound good in
theory—let’s make it easier for people to own their own
homes—but you can’t let people borrow money they can’t
pay back. As long as the democrats could take credit for getting loans
for low-income voters, they were happy; without ever considering the
catastrophe that would happen if those loans defaulted by the thousands.
The republicans are just as much to blame. They
controlled Congress when this whole thing started. Where was the
leadership? Where was the oversight?
Reason #3: The Bush administration sat by and fiddled
while Rome burned. This situation has been coming at us like a slow-moving
train for about 10 years. Did the Bush administration do anything to
stop it? Where was the treasury secretary? Where was the head of the SEC?
Where was the Federal Reserve? Where was the warning? Where were the red
flags? Where was the tightening of regulations that would have easily
Reason #4: Congress—both parties. We heard
nothing from them while this happened, except for the partisan name-calling
after the fact.
I heard an interview with Speaker of the House Nancy
Pelosi the other day. She was asked point-blank, “Does the Congress
have any blame in this situation.” She immediately said, “No.
None,” and went into the canned talking points about how this was all
the doing of the evil Bush administration. Her answer is obscene. To be so
partisan at a time like this, when the Congress could have done something
to stop this, is outrageous. The head of the House Banking Committee,
Barney Frank, was one of the major proponents of giving mortgages to people
who couldn’t pay them back. Where was he and his committee for the
last several years? Where was the proposed legislation to curb the bad
lending practices? And now, where are the Congressional hearings? Where are
the investigations? Why is Congress not looking into this to try and find
the culpable parties who stole the retirement money of millions of
Americans? If the republicans controlled Congress right now, do you think
someone like Barney Frank or Nancy Pelosi wouldn’t be screaming for
At this point, even an old libertarian like me has to
hold his nose and agree that further interference by the government is the
only thing that can keep us from a possible economic collapse, but, instead
of giving $900 billion to the greedy SOBs who got us into this mess,
here’s an idea: Why don’t we simply use that money to pay off
the mortgages? I hate the government getting involved at all in the matters
of private businesses, and people who live beyond their means have no one
to blame but themselves for their financial problems, but if the choice is
give the money to Wall Street or give the money to pay off mortgages of
low-income Americans, why are we giving it to the millionaires?