Judge Says TruGreen Can Keep Callin’

image_pdf

I just won another 3-day, 2-night vacation to the Bahamas. I think it’s the fourth or fifth such vacation I’ve won these past three months. I’m not sure when I will be able to take them. It doesn’t matter; I’m in no hurry. My plan is to wait until I’ve accumulated five or six more of these “all expenses paid” vacations and turn them into a 2-week, sun-splashed, margarita-sippin’ adventure.

OK, enough of the sarcasm. I don’t do it well, my wife Vicky reminds me, so I’ll get to the point.

The vacations I am promised are unsolicited pre-recorded telemarketing calls—robocalls. I get the same woman’s voice, same offer about every two weeks or so. That I get them on my cell phone surprises me as I use that phone number almost exclusively for business. I don’t use that phone to enter contests, buy products or anything else that would suggest I would bite on a pre-recorded vacation pitch.

Those robocalls came to mind recently when I read an article appearing on legalnewsline.com. The gist of the article is that a Tennessee federal judge ruled against a class action suit filed by a Memphis woman who claimed that, in spite of asking TruGreen not to contact her with any more contract offers, the company, using an automatic dialing system, continued to call. The woman had been a previous TruGreen customer. She based part of her complaint on the fact that her telephone number was on the national do-not-call registry.

Follow us on Twitter @TurfMagazine for regular updates.

Technically, the judge ruled in favor of a waiver in her expired contract. That contract contained language that permitted TruGreen to continue to contact her regarding current and possible future services. It also included a class action waiver that prohibited her from engaging in a class action against the company, requiring arbitration for the settlement of any disputes. The judge’s finding for arbitration, in effect, quashed the suit.

The law is the law and a contract is a contract; this I appreciate. Nevertheless, I feel empathy for the woman. Did she understand just what was meant by the arbitration clause? I’m not sure I fully understand what it means… and that’s after reading the article on legalnewsline.com.

Even so, it seems to me that TruGreen (It could be any telemarketing company attempting to reconnect with a previous customer.) should have respected the woman’s decision not to be bothered by robocalls—out of courtesy if for no other reason.

10 COMMENTS

  1. TrueGreen has guaranteed themselves they will never get this woman and probably many of her friends as customers again. Why would any company want to instill hatred for themselves to previous and possible future customers?

    • I am thinking the same thing. How would they like it if tie up their 800 line or even their local lines? I know a guy who called a company and recorded nonsense so they could not take anymore recording – oh man did it cost them as he used a throw away calling card.

  2. The judge, and/or state contract laws of Tennessee are morons. Valid contracts in theory involve exchange of value; once the ‘values’ have been satisfied, the contract is done. If a couple were divorced, and one kept contacting the other against his/her will, that would be harassment, if not outright stalking. Hiding a loophole to allow for legal harassment in perpetuity is so blatantly contrary to common sense that the judge should have called it; they probably cannot afford legal counsel to pursue appeal if the arbitration fails, but to rule for the company is preposterous. Contacting the largest newpaper and local TV ‘investigative reporter’ with the sordid details should be more effective, via bad publicity, in getting results, but they need to get it in writing before signing off on anything. Also, depending on statutes, it often is more realistic to take ’em to small claims court, where you argue w/o a lawyer in lay terms, for more limited dollar settlements, but may get a more responsive, sympathetic ear; if you get a favorable ruling and they stall, you have a legal precedent already established to move up the legal ladder.

  3. Hilarious, turf mag! I’ve contacted u guys mire times than I remember asking u to stop sending me UNWANTED EMAILS! So who are u to say anything?! I’m so glad the headline caught my attention! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE TAKE MY EMAIL ADDRESS OFF YOUR MAILING LIST!!!

    • Hi kimmann68, We’ve forwarded on your request to be removed from our mailing list. It may take a few days to go into affect. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

    • Hi kimmann68, We’ve forwarded on your request to be removed from our mailing list. It may take a few days to go into affect. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

Comments are closed.